QuoteReplyTopic: Not neediing to Pee Posted: 03 November 2010 at 11:08am
Hi
I am 36 weeks pregnant and am finding I don't have that constant need to pee like I did the first time around. Has anyone else experienced this?? I am not complaining... It is really good but just wondering if it is anything to worry about. Am going to chat to MW tomtrrow about it.
I didn't have to throughout my first pregnancy. I often laughed when people commented about pregnant women needing to be near a toilet and being up several times a night because it just didn't happen to me. But it isn't a laughing matter I am sure for those who are constantly running to the loo. I would think that as long as you are drinking plenty etc then it isn't an issue - perhaps it is to do with the baby's postioning this time around.
ive noticed that ive gone from getting up 6-7 times a night to one or two in the last wee while, though during the day i generally need to go every hour still heh..
Im not on second baby but I have heard second babies don't engage until later, and that the lower down they are the more they squash the bladder so maybe that's why? Not sure really.
Me 28, DH 29 DS born 20 Nov 2010 (4 years old) #2 due October 7
I have recently had baby number four......I very rarely got up at night to pee...and didn't have too much extra toilet time during the day. However #2 pregnancy I felt like I was constantly in the loo!! Each pregnancy can be soooo different!
First pregnancy I spent most of my time in the loo - day and night, second pregnancy I didn't go anymore than usual and hardly ever got up at night. You're right mumoftwins - so incredibly different!
Do you know what you're having Richtea? My first was a girl and second a boy ... maybe its a bluey in there
Has it been like this the whole pregnancy? If it has remained fairly consistent I wouldn't even mention it to the MW.
Ev, Mum to:
Carys Ruby - 4 October 2007
Spencer James - 2 July 2010
yea. most likely baby just isnt engaging at all. great feeling aye ;)
Both my kids were engaged from the end of the second tris and both laying exactly the same position as each other right through ... I reckon it must be a boy thing
Ev, Mum to:
Carys Ruby - 4 October 2007
Spencer James - 2 July 2010
This one is a girl as well, did speak to the midwife and she said pretty much what others have said that it is just the position of this one. Head isn't engaged and to enjoy it whilst it lasts. Thanks for all the comments, great to get some reassurance that I am not alone
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Not neediing to Pee
Topic Options
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Our angel Ella Louise born 13.04.
monikah wrote: