Not neediing to Pee
Printed From: OHbaby!
Category: Pregnant
Forum Name: Pregnancy
Forum Description: Pregnant! Wanting to chat to other mums-to-be (or dads-to-be)? Share your thoughts, experiences, and ideas... This is that place!
URL: https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=36524
Printed Date: 14 August 2025 at 2:42pm
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.05 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: Not neediing to Pee
Posted By: Richtea
Subject: Not neediing to Pee
Date Posted: 03 November 2010 at 11:08am
|
Hi I am 36 weeks pregnant and am finding I don't have that constant need to pee like I did the first time around. Has anyone else experienced this?? I am not complaining... It is really good but just wondering if it is anything to worry about. Am going to chat to MW tomtrrow about it. Thanks ------------- http://lilypie.com">  
|
Replies:
Posted By: Red
Date Posted: 03 November 2010 at 11:27am
|
I didn't have to pee much either - did mention to my midwife, think I went for urine test or something but all was fine ------------- http://lilypie.com">  http://lilypie.com">
|
Posted By: Rainbow
Date Posted: 03 November 2010 at 12:11pm
|
I didn't have to throughout my first pregnancy. I often laughed when people commented about pregnant women needing to be near a toilet and being up several times a night because it just didn't happen to me. But it isn't a laughing matter I am sure for those who are constantly running to the loo. I would think that as long as you are drinking plenty etc then it isn't an issue - perhaps it is to do with the baby's postioning this time around. ------------- http://lilypie.com"> 
http://lilypie.com"> 
|
Posted By: Marengo
Date Posted: 03 November 2010 at 12:43pm
|
ive noticed that ive gone from getting up 6-7 times a night to one or two in the last wee while, though during the day i generally need to go every hour still heh.. ------------- http://lilypie.com"> 
http://lilypie.com"> 
 Our angel Ella Louise born 13.04.
|
Posted By: snugglebug
Date Posted: 03 November 2010 at 3:31pm
|
Im not on second baby but I have heard second babies don't engage until later, and that the lower down they are the more they squash the bladder so maybe that's why? Not sure really. ------------- Me 28, DH 29 DS born 20 Nov 2010 (4 years old) #2 due October 7 http://lilypie.com" rel="nofollow"> 
|
Posted By: monikah
Date Posted: 03 November 2010 at 3:52pm
|
yea. most likely baby just isnt engaging at all. great feeling aye ;) ------------- 
|
Posted By: AandCsmum
Date Posted: 03 November 2010 at 5:26pm
Yep...never got up at night to pee with Mr C 
Don't think I needed to go much during the day either. ------------- Kel http://lilypie.com"> 
A = 01.02.04 & C = 16.01.09 & G = 30.03.12 |
Posted By: High9
Date Posted: 03 November 2010 at 8:03pm
|
I never experienced it with my first baby - enjoy it! ------------- http://lilypie.com"> 
|
Posted By: mumoftwins
Date Posted: 03 November 2010 at 8:24pm
| I have recently had baby number four......I very rarely got up at night to pee...and didn't have too much extra toilet time during the day. However #2 pregnancy I felt like I was constantly in the loo!! Each pregnancy can be soooo different! |
Posted By: babyg
Date Posted: 04 November 2010 at 5:12pm
|
First pregnancy I spent most of my time in the loo - day and night, second pregnancy I didn't go anymore than usual and hardly ever got up at night. You're right mumoftwins - so incredibly different!
Do you know what you're having Richtea? My first was a girl and second a boy ... maybe its a bluey in there 
Has it been like this the whole pregnancy? If it has remained fairly consistent I wouldn't even mention it to the MW. ------------- Ev, Mum to: Carys Ruby - 4 October 2007 Spencer James - 2 July 2010 |
Posted By: babyg
Date Posted: 04 November 2010 at 5:14pm
Both my kids were engaged from the end of the second tris and both laying exactly the same position as each other right through ... I reckon it must be a boy thing ------------- Ev, Mum to: Carys Ruby - 4 October 2007 Spencer James - 2 July 2010 |
monikah wrote:Posted By: Richtea
Date Posted: 05 November 2010 at 9:47pm
This one is a girl as well, did speak to the midwife and she said pretty much what others have said that it is just the position of this one. Head isn't engaged and to enjoy it whilst it lasts. Thanks for all the comments, great to get some reassurance that I am not alone ------------- http://lilypie.com">
|