I'm 3 days overdue and all things considered, don't feel to bad. My midwife did an internal exam at my appointment last week (39+4) and although my cervix was softening and forward, nothing else was happening. She did suggest she could have done a s&s wasn't too keen to as baby was not at all engaged (although head down) and she didn't want to 'force' things before either my body or baby was ready.
I was happy with that as DD was induced at 40 weeks, didn't engage until labour and ended up stuck due to the way she engaged - something I don't want happening this time and I feel a lot of the problems were caused by my body and DD not being ready to go.
Had another appointment today and baby is still not engaged (still head down though) so we didn't bother with an internal so as not to disrupt anything before baby had the chance to engage itself. Same reasoning as last time - we want baby to engage correctly so leaving it to do it itself should *hopefully* mean it engages correctly and therefore makes for a better birth.
The 'plan' from here is to be monitored for a little bit on Sunday if still pregnant, followed by a s&s if things are more favourable. A scan last week showed baby is happy as, growing well, plenty of fluid etc
I did feel a little deflated after this mornings appointment though as she commented that she thinks it will be at least another week and wouldn't be surprised if I need inducing at 42 weeks.
I'm totally on board with what she has/hasn't done so far, I trust her opinion 100% and am happy to wait until 42 weeks to think about induction (not that long in the scheme of things), but am also curious as to other peoples experience with stubborn non-engaging babies and their subsequent births? Id be gutted to get to 42 weeks and have baby STILL not engaged in the slightest - would feel a bit like a repeat of last time!
Any other thoughts and experiences to ease my mind a bit would be awesome too